ASK Musings

No matter where you go, there you are.

Politics Archive

Tuesday

14

October 2014

0

COMMENTS

Health Care Funding

Written by , Posted in Politics

So, yeah. Just a couple of items I’d like to dray to your attention.

First up, this article from today’s Seattle Times: Wake Up and Fund Public Health: “Here in Seattle and King County, an invisible infrastructure is working its magic and keeping us all relatively safe. Next time you see a public-health worker, give him or her a pat on the back.”

It comes on the heels of yesterday’s Seattle Time editorial: “Public Health’s funding woes began more than a decade ago after voters repealed the state motor-vehicle excise tax. Neither state nor federal funding has adequately filled in the gap. Grants are limited. Costs are up. Revenue is not keeping pace with inflation or population growth.”

And this evening, a friend sent me a link to this political ad:
http://youtu.be/c3D0DxjgPB0. It’s pretty intense, but it makes some good points.

Yes, I work in Public Health. I’m funded through a grant, and that money will go away in the future. But the work I have to do has to happen to make sure that people in this county can recovery from an emergency with public health impacts. That doesn’t just happen magically. Organizing that response can’t be outsourced to a private contractor. This is the work of the government, and we can’t do it if we don’t have the funds. I appreciate that people are paying attention a bit more now, but Ebola isn’t the only reason we need a strong Public Health system in this country.

Monday

13

October 2014

0

COMMENTS

Indigenous People’s Day

Written by , Posted in Politics

Hello! Did you check your mail this evening and wonder why there was nothing in there? Did you pay a bill over the weekend and wonder why the money hasn’t been taken out of your bank account yet? In case you missed it (although if you work for the federal government, or the City government in New York, you had the day off), today is “Columbus Day,” a.k.a. Let’s Celebrate a Genocide But Pretend We’re Celebrating Italian Heritage Day.

Sadly we aren’t really taught much about Mr. Columbus in school that is accurate (at least not in the public schools I attended), but a quick Google search for “Real Christopher Columbus” brings up a whole lot of writing on what a horrible man he was. Hopefully by now you know that he didn’t ‘discover’ shit and that most folks had known the world was round for centuries before he set sail. But the true depth of his depravity is pretty shocking.

If you’re looking to brush up on your Christopher Columbus history, here are some suggested articles:

– “And Columbus, while remembered as a hero by many, was brutal to the native people. In his quest to find gold, he enslaved them, working thousands to death; brutalized them; and murdered them.” Columbus’s Real Legacy: The Brutal Disparities Suffered By Native Americans

– “In the year 1495, they went on a great slave raid, rounded up 1,500 Arawak men, women, and children, put them in pens guarded by Spaniards and dogs, then picked the 500 best specimens to load onto ships. Of those 500, 200 died en route.” The Real Christopher Columbus

And of course the fantastic John Oliver offered his take last week: How Is this Still A Thing?

Now, this holiday really should never have come to pass. But it doesn’t surprise me, given we still have an NFL team with a racial slur for a name. Collectively, people in the U.S. don’t seem to really care about what atrocities people committed – including genocide, and slavery – to get us to where we are.

Some cities and states, however, are taking a small step to point out the ridiculousness of this. My city passed a resolution last week designating the second Monday in October as “Indigenous People’s Day,” which is quite literally the least we can do. Of course some folks who don’t seem to have the ability to comprehend history have taken offense to this, including one representative of an Italian-American group who said “By this resolution you say to all Italian-Americans that the city of Seattle no longer deems your heritage or your community worthy of recognition.” Which – what? Um, if your Italian-American heritage is dependent on a genocidal jackass like Columbus, that’s on you. This action says nothing about modern-day Italians. Good reminder that not everything is about you. This is about Native Americans (for once).

Sunday

21

September 2014

0

COMMENTS

Rise of the Warrior Cop

Written by , Posted in Politics, Reviews

Five Stars

rise of the warrior cop

We have a problem with policing in this country. Hopefully this isn’t a surprise, although many people have only started to notice this since the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson last month. People in many communities, for years, have been more fearful of the police than of the criminals in their communities; this is especially true for black people, who can be shot for having a BB gun, a toy sword, or nothing at all.

Mr. Balko has written a book that unfortunately is all too relevant these days. The book focuses on the problems with the militarization of the police and the culture that sees officers acting as though everyone is the enemy, and it specifically focuses on the drug war and SWAT teams. It has taken me over a month to read (I’ve started and finished two books and about 20 magazines in that time) because it is infuriating. It is well written and well-researched. It is ‘easy’ to read, in that the sentences and paragraphs flow logically, and the book itself is broken down by decade to clearly demonstrate how things have changed. But it is infuriating. I wrote a variation of ‘fuck’ or ‘ew’ on every other page, because each section made me angrier and angrier. Mr. Balko wrote a great, infuriating book, and I wish everyone would read it.

The drug war is ridiculous, but seeing it really spelled out in print, and reading how it is so tied into a culture that seeks bigger and deadlier toys to ‘enforce the law’ made me, and makes me, sick to my stomach. My blood pressure would rise, my pulse would race, and it would take a whole lot of self-control to not just fling the book at a window every couple of pages. Much of this comes from the illustrating stories that point out the times when SWAT teams utterly fuck up. The botched raids are not rare; they are examples of what happens when a group of people gets all the power but has none of the self-awareness to recognize that they are doing something wrong. Shooting dogs in the head, breaking down doors, holding people at gun point without ever announcing who they are. Can you IMAGINE being awoken at midnight by a bunch of people in dark clothes pointing guns and yelling at you? I assume I would pee myself and consider that I was about to be sexually assaulted and then murdered. There is rarely, if ever a need for this kind of use of force, and yet here we are, openly supporting it with federal grants, surplus Pentagon equipment and broken policies.

I live in Seattle, and was here during the WTO riots. Norm Stamper was police chief then, and he wrote a book saying that what the Seattle PD did during those protests – throwing tear gas into crowds, blocking people in – was right. But after his book tour he realized he was so very wrong, and now he realizes that his actions are partly responsible for the devolution of rights of civilians in the face of power-hunger cops. The way the police handled Occupy protests throughout the country was so disappointing; the way some handle the day-to-day operations with quasi-military force to recover a few ounces of marijuana or heroin from non-violent drug offenders should scare the crap out of you.

Are all cops bad? Obviously not. There are some amazing officers doing great work. That isn’t the point of this book. The point is that we’ve passed laws, set policy and created grants that make it easier for police to believe that the law doesn’t apply to them as they seek to enforce the law. That is unacceptable, and we need to speak out and demand some change. Now.

Sunday

24

August 2014

0

COMMENTS

What I’m Reading – August 24, 2014

Written by , Posted in Feminism, Politics

I had a fantastic week in Hawaii, but I have to admit I was relieved this morning to get out of the car at the grocery store and not immediately feel like I need a shower.

– Ferguson. The Front Lines of Ferguson (h/t @scATX)

– Ferguson. Nurse On Site Was Not Allowed to Tend Mike Brown

– Ferguson. Advice for Ferguson From the Supreme Court (h/t @AllisonKilkenny)

– The physical anger I feel at this disgusting editorial – I can feel my blood pressure rising. What. An. Asshole. I’m a cop. If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t challenge me. (h/t @Karnythia)

– Some rationality to counter that crap above: For blacks, America is dangerous by default (via @PrisonCulture)

– Justice Ginsburg speaks the truth: Justice Ginsburg: America Has A ‘Real Racial Problem’ (via @ThinkProgress)

– Is there a way to stop this? The Catholic Church is Managing Many Local Hospitals. How Will it Affect Your Health Care?

– This hits close to home because my sister and her fiance are both trying to get tenured positions: The Adjunct Crisis: A Reading List

– We have some flexibility with out work hours and it’s pretty fantastic: Yes, Flexible Hours Ease Stress. But Is Everyone on Board?

Sunday

27

July 2014

0

COMMENTS

Playing the Whore: The Work of Sex Work by Melissa Gira Grant

Written by , Posted in Feminism, Politics, Reviews

Four Stars

“Sex work can indeed be empowering. But that is not the point. Money is the fucking point.”
– Melissa Gira Grant, Playing the Whore

playing the whore

Growing up I had three basic images of sex work (although I didn’t call it that then): the Julia Roberts / Pretty Woman version; the desperate, drug addicted woman; and the ‘sex slave’ in another country who was ‘rescued’ regularly on Dateline and 48 Hours. I didn’t spend time thinking about sex workers, but I did wonder why sex work was illegal in most places.

Recently I’ve become more interested in labor rights; specifically how society views certain types of labor as worthy (of money or legality) and others as deserving of criminalization or at least disdain. I live in Seattle, where the fight to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour was met with such charming arguments from non-shift workers as ‘what did a McDonald’s worker do to deserve that? I barely make that!’ as though people in the fast food industry aren’t working just as hard as people sitting in air conditioned offices, able to take coffee and bathroom breaks whenever they want.

This interest led me to Ms. Grant’s book. She takes a perspective that is missing in coverage of sex work and workers – one that does not start by asking ‘should people do sex work’ but instead asks what can we do to improve the lives of the people who work in that industry. The book is well-written and educated me on the topic, but when asked to describe it in a few sentences I have a hard time. Each chapter feels like a separate essay in a broader collection, and initially I was not sure of the main purpose of the book, as it covers a broad area. It is not a linear history of sex work, nor is it an argument (primarily) for the decriminalization or legalization of sex work. It is more than that.

Going back through my notes and rereading the portions I highlighted does bring more clarity to me. That is a function not of Ms. Grant’s writing, but of my need to re-read the book to better take in all of the information she shares. Her purpose seems to be to point out all of the ways in which people who seek to help sex workers fail, and in doing so Ms. Grant draws the reader’s attention to the need for the reader to take actions in solidarity with these workers, and support those who can change the conditions of their lives for the better, not pull them out of sex work or make it more dangerous for them to perform the work they do.

Ms. Grant illustrates this in many ways, including critiquing the fight against online posting of sex worker ads and the large anti-sex work organizations that purport to rescue sex workers from horrible conditions. Ms. Grant points out that so many of the ‘rescued’ end up in worse situations, with less agency than they had when doing sex work, and concludes that this stems from the inability of so many to see these women and men as people doing a job and not as one-dimensional ‘whores.’

“The goal, these antiprostitute advocates say, of eradicating men’s desire for paid sex isn’t ‘antisex’ but to restore the personhood of prostitutes, that is, of people who are already people except to those who claim to want to fix them.”

That’s the point, really. Sex workers are people first, people who make their money in the sex work industry. The problems these workers face doesn’t stem from the morality of sex work – they originate with the rest of society, which is invested in making sex work dangerous. The question the reader is left with – that I am left with – is what am I going to do to benefit these workers?

 

 

Friday

4

July 2014

0

COMMENTS

The Internet’s Own Boy – A Review and More

Written by , Posted in Politics, Reviews

The Internet’s Own Boy

The way I spent today is not how I’ve spent past 4th of July holidays, but I think I’m going to aim to do so in the future. Instead of fireworks and barbecues, I would love to take the 4th of July as a day to really examine an issue or two (via film, music, art or books) that our country is getting wrong. Yes, there are some fantastic things about this country, but the more I read and the more I learn, the more I see so many injustices. There are the obvious ongoing ones (colonialism, slavery, racism, misogyny, the carceral state, income inequality), but there are also the ones that I am just not tracking but clearly should be.

This film falls into the latter category. After watching it I’m angry, I’m sad, and I’m inspired as hell but also a little overwhelmed. A lack of knowledge – scientific, historic, and political – motivates the authors of so many bad laws, court decisions, and policies. We only need to look at Monday’s Hobby Lobby ruling, where a company was allowed to argue that because they claim to believe something – even if it is wrong (Plan B is not, in fact, an abortifacient) – they can use that to deny access to healthcare to others. That basic lack of scientific understanding is the foundation of so many horrific policies. If more people in the public (not those in power – they likely know what’s up, but don’t benefit from the facts and so twist or deny them instead) had the opportunity to see how laws are implemented, or studies are conducted, or research is done, they might view things differently, might support different causes, and might not be as content with the status quo.

Aaron Swartz was many things, and this documentary seeks to share who he was with the public while exploring the seemingly abusive prosecution that appears to have ultimately lead to his suicide. Faced with 13 counts of charges stemming from plugging his computer into MIT’s system to download journal articles (possibly with the goal of analyzing them to see if there is a relationship between corporate dollars and how climate change science is researched), he took his own life. I had read about what many view as prosecutorial misconduct in this case – this likely should have been a simple civil matter between Mr. Swartz and MIT, not a literal federal case – but this film certainly helped me understand it better.

The narrative is pretty straightforward. We follow Mr. Swartz from his youth (reading by the age of three) through his 20s, when he was an instrumental part of stopping SOPA, a horribly crafted piece of legislation that you might remember from when many sites – including Wikipedia and Reddit – went dark for a full 24-hours to protest the censorship the bill would perpetuate. Mr. Swartz believed in knowledge and education, and felt strongly that the public should have access to knowledge and public materials. Through interviews with his family members, former colleagues (including Lawrence Lessig), and members of the community fighting for an open internet (e.g. Electronic Frontier Foundation), the film builds a picture of someone who was a rational idealist and a real progressive who saw important wrongs that needed to be fixed.

When I was contemplating law school I assumed I would go into mass media law. I found it fascinating, and since I was attending school during the turn of the century, there was a lot that was not known. Napster was still a thing, and piracy was presented as the beginning of the end for creativity and knowledge. And here is where I am still conflicted. We live in a money-fueled society. In the current system, journal articles and other research and knowledge are often built as a way for the authors to learn but also to survive. For someone to be able to spend months on a research project, they need to be able to have a place to live, food to eat, etc. While many of these articles are funded by research grants and tax dollars from the government, I have a hard time trying to figure out how, in the system we currently have, right now, we can change the motivation while still making the information public.

But thanks to films like this, I’m interested. I want to learn more. I know net neutrality is in trouble, and I want to be involved in ways to ensure that corporations can’t limit my access to certain website. I’m furious that the FBI and others felt that it made sense to prosecute this man literally to death because he downloaded journal articles. I’m also interested in learning more about how to balance creativity and knowledge with surviving in the system we have now while seeking to change the system itself.

I suggest checking the film out, especially if you are someone who wants to see this nation do better and be better. If you’re in Seattle, it’s playing at the Egyptian from the 11th through the 18th. It’s also available nationally via Amazon streaming for about $7 for a three-day rental.

Monday

16

June 2014

0

COMMENTS

Brazil’s Dance with the Devil

Written by , Posted in Politics, Reviews

Three Stars

Zirin

I love soccer, and I’ve been looking forward to this World Cup since, well, since it ended in 2010. Back then I watched games at pubs in England and Germany between revisions to my thesis; this year I’ll do more listening via a streaming app since now I have a desk job. Like many people, I spent my youth loving the Olympics (and later, the World Cup) without really thinking about the impact the games have on the cities and countries that seek to host them.

The past few years, however, especially in the lead up to the seemingly extraordinarily corrupt Sochi games, have brought the issues of these large-scale sporting events to my mind. I mean, I’d heard about bribery in Salt Lake City, and I know that, on a smaller scale, new stadiums are often sold as an economic boon to a city but rarely if ever actually make up for the economic and social costs. When I saw that Dave Zirin, sports writer for The Nation, was writing a book about the lead-up to the World Cup and the Olympics in Brazil, I knew I had to check it out to try to educate myself.

This is a good book. It’s written in a way that kept me engaged, and I think part of that comes from Mr. Zirin’s talent as a magazine writer. While he’s written other books, I primarily associate him with shorter pieces, and this book feels like an extension of a short piece (in a good way). He condensed a lot of complicated history into a few pages, which obviously can’t tell the full story, but it gave enough background to set the current stage. He shared interviews with the residents at risk of being evicted by World Cup and Olympics construction, and helped shatter (for me anyway) the idea that favelas are primarily dangerous ‘slums’. He doesn’t gloss over the real problems that already existed in some of these areas, but he also shares why these communities feel so connected to their homes, and why what the government is looking to do to them is so troubling. I’ve known for a while that my education in this area is woefully lacking; I’m more than a little embarrassed that it took the World Cup coming to Brazil for me to seek out more information on it.

I did want more from this book, but it’s hard for me to put my finger on what that is. I’m so glad he wrote it, and I hope more people read it. I also hope that he does a follow-up book on what happened during the World Cup, what else is happening with the Olympics, and perhaps offers up some suggestions on how we can throw these giant events without them turning into corrupt endeavors that serve to make the rich richer.

Thursday

29

May 2014

0

COMMENTS

What I’m Reading – May 29 2014

Written by , Posted in Feminism, Politics

This last week was a doozy. Much of what I’ll be posting below relates to the mass murder in Isla Vista. CN: Depressing, familiar misogyny.

– Most school shooting victims are women: What Elliot Rodger Said About Women Reveals Why We Need to Stamp Out Misogyny

– Oh Seth Rogen. Seth Rogen Is Not A Victim Of The Santa Barbara Killings (via @ThinkProgress)

– Word: Your Princess Is in Another Castle: Misogyny, Entitlement, and Nerds (via @AustinKelmore)

– A tumblr started just this weekend. Look at how many posts it already has: When Women Refuse

– Finally, thanks to Brittany for this:

Tuesday

15

April 2014

0

COMMENTS

Sister Citizen by Melissa Harris-Perry

Written by , Posted in Feminism, Politics, Reviews

Four Stars

sistercitizen

Melissa Harris-Perry hosts a show on MSNBC on the weekends. She’s known for having actual people on the show to discuss news stories that impact them – she doesn’t invite six old white men on to discuss whether birth control should be covered under the Affordable Care Act. If she’s talking about an issue, she seeks to invite people on who KNOW about the topic, and who, if possible, are affected by the topic.

So it makes sense that she would want to write a book about how Black women are (mis)recognized in the United States, using focus groups, real-world examples, and references in literature and popular culture. Sister Citizen is a deep look into how Black women have faced the intersection of race and gender living in the United States. Using the concept of trying to stand up straight in a ‘crooked room,’ she talks through many of the different ways Black women are pigeon-holed into stereotypes, negative images, or ideas that support the White concept of what Black women should be. US society perpetuates negative and destructive images of Black woman, and Dr. Harris-Perry’s book delves into the origins and how Black women deal with this.

As expected by a professor she makes well-researched, strong arguments about the ways in which these stereotypes impact how Black women are viewed by others and how they view themselves. It’s challenging to write more about this because, well, she’s already written it well, and I don’t think there’s much that I could presume to add. All I can really do is recommend it highly.

Wednesday

12

March 2014

2

COMMENTS

$15 an hour

Written by , Posted in Politics

Like many of you, I’ve been following closely the movements across the country seeking increased pay for people currently making minimum wage. In the county I live in, one city passed a ballot initiative increasing the minimum wage to $15/hour; unfortunately it was ruled to not apply to airport workers. My current home recently elected the first socialist council member in years; Kshama Sawant is now leading the charge to have a $15/hour minimum wage here. Mayor Murray has issued an order increasing the minimum wage of City of Seattle employees to $15/hour; he’s also created a panel to explore raising the wage in the rest of the City. That committee seems to be viewing $15/hour as a starting point for negotiations, suggesting that a lower wage, or a wage + compensation approach, may be warranted, while labor is demanding $15/hour without including benefits.

Minimum wage workers are doing HARD jobs. Someone standing over a hot grill, or a fryer, or washing cars, or loading / unloading baggage off of plane is working way harder than nearly everyone I know who is working at an office job. Office jobs certainly can have their own stresses, although really none of them are unique to working in an office. But when I go to work, I can sit down in a chair. I can take a bathroom break whenever I want. Unless I have a meeting that conflicts, I can take lunch whenever I want. If I get sick, I use one of my sick days. And with the money I earn, I can make my monthly (absurd) student loan payments, pay my rent, go out to dinner, and travel. It’s awesome.

But that’s the perk of having a college degree, right? NOPE. At least, it shouldn’t be. The ability to go to the bathroom when I need to, or have enough money to maybe eat out on occasion, or buy a birthday present for my loved ones, shouldn’t be a perk of having gone to college (or knowing someone who could get me a decent-paying job). It should be something all humans are deserving of. Honestly, I doubt any CEO could work a month doing the jobs of their lowest paid employees. It’s hard, it’s work that we all ask to exist (if we, you know, ever eat in, or eat out, or buy clothes, or travel), and we should be paying these people as though they are human beings.

I’ve heard the response that ‘they just need to work harder, and move up to management.’ Um, okay. Let’s say they do that. Then who will be doing their current job? Another human who is earning poverty wages. Unless you figure out a way to never need any humans to perform the labor that runs this city and this country, there will always be ‘entry-level’ jobs that people work in for years, and I think those people deserve respect and should have their humanity recognized. If someone is working 35 or 40 hours a week, there should be absolutely no scenario where they need food stamps to be able to feed themselves or their families.

I’ve also heard talk that we need to protect businesses because this will hit them hard. The Stranger had an interesting piece on this whole issue, but specifically pointed out the fact that the large chain businesses (AMC theaters, Walgreens) have the ability to support their local stores because they have access to more money overall than the smaller companies. That’s true, and something to consider. But let’s also point out that chain businesses are horrible examples of the ‘success’ of low wages: while they save money that they pass on to stockholders (not labor), they cost taxpayers $7 billion in benefits because the wages are not enough for the workers to buy food and housing for their families. That alone should be enough to convince the fiscal conservatives who are such huge fans of bootstraps, free markets, and no handouts that we should require the companies, not the government, to make sure their employees are fairly compensated.

But it is true that even if Wal-Mart is finally forced to once again give a damn about their employees, they’ll be in a better position to compete against the smaller guys. That’s why the only place where I see the merit of a brief (maybe two years) phased approach is with non-chain, smaller businesses. My understanding is that small businesses often operate with very small margins, and an immediate hit to their budgets could put them out of business forever. A couple of years would allow them time to adjust.

However, I do want to make a point on this: if your business (small or large) can only be successful by paying poverty level wages, then I don’t think it’s a very good business. You may make the most delicious baked goods that people wait in line for hours to eat, but if the people stocking your shelves and mopping up after you have to go home to a second or third job and food stamps for you to be able to do it? YOUR BUSINESS IS NOT REALLY SUCCESSFUL! The business owner probably works very, very hard too (especially with these tiny independent storefronts), but they have the added benefit of getting to enjoy the profits once they come in. The workers will still be going to their second and third jobs.

This raises another issue: does a $15/hour wage mean that only the wealthy will be able to start businesses? I mean, I think many businesses are already started by people who have managed to accumulate SOME wealth (enough to buy inventory, rent space, etc.). But will this limit new businesses from coming on board? I really hope not. If the minimum wage is not increased, I’d love to see some super low-interest loan program created that is available ONLY to people wanting to start a small business who pledge to pay a living wage to all employees. That could be incentive to pay a proper living wage without limiting the idea of small business ownership to only those willing to make up the differences by paying workers poverty wages.

I’m not an economist (although they don’t agree on anything, and are pretty bad at predicting things in general), so my understanding of business and labor lacks nuance for sure. I’ll be watching what’s going on very closely, and reading more about it, because from everything I’ve read so far I would be proud to live in one of the first major cities in the U.S. to recognize in the law that people who work minimum wage positions are actually people, and that business only works because of labor.